HOT BLAST: In the South, are we all guilty? (Paula Deen version)
Jul 02, 2013 | 2177 views |  0 comments | 76 76 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Paula Deen
Paula Deen
slideshow
The Paula Deen story was hardly the most important in America last week. But, gosh, did it receive more than its 15 minutes of fame.

It was a polarizing study of many things Southern: race, intelligence, unhealthy cooking. Paula Deen's defenders, numerous in the South, rose up en masse, as if a religious figurehead had been verbally attacked. Her dissenters were just as vocal.

This week, a columnist in the National Review has penned a piece that -- let's be kind here -- takes Deen's opponents and the "liberal media" to task. He also defends the South and its economic and political advances, though he conveniently downplays the South's firm struggles in areas such as public education.

The author, Lee Habeeb, writes, "Where did the media elite’s sense of outrage come from? It’s simple, actually. To admit that the South had changed would mean letting go of their own cultural and moral superiority, of their sense of regional superiority with respect to the issue of race. Media and academic elites believe that, but for proper adult supervision, the South will return to its racist roots and that they alone can protect helpless black southerners from the perfidy rooted in white southerners’ DNA."

It's another chapter in a story that wasn't that big in the first place. The real issue isn't Deen; it's the health of Southerners who too often eat the buttery, fat-filled foods that Deen has long promoted.

-- Phillip Tutor

Comments must be made through Facebook
No personal attacks
No name-calling
No offensive language
Comments must stay on topic
No infringement of copyrighted material


Friends to Follow



Today's Events

event calendar

post a new event

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Marketplace