by The Anniston Star Editorial Board
Jul 01, 2009 | 2469 views | 14

|
33 
|
|
The city of Oxford is fond of building things: shopping malls and storefronts, high school additions and a swanky public library, not to mention its bank account.
Too bad city leaders aren't as fond of building their reputation for doing what's altogether right and appropriate.
Oxford's decision to bulldoze a portion of a hill that contains a Native American stone mound and possibly human remains is a condemnable act that says much about some city leaders' priorities.
Needing fill dirt for construction of a Sam's Club at Oxford Exchange, the city agreed to provide the dirt instead of buying it from a third party. A sound decision, on the surface. And, yes, a large hill — made of dirt suitable to fill in a construction site — sits conveniently and directly behind the Exchange.
By Oxford standards, it's an easy decision aided by an apparent tin ear to conversations of compromise or correctness.
Build, build, build.
That archaeological experts are adamant that Native Americans used the hill's stone mound for religious purposes has been ignored.
That the hill may include Indian burial grounds has too easily been discounted.
That Oxford Mayor Leon Smith and City Project Manager Fred Denney say the hill was used only for sending smoke signals is a boorish, offensive comment that unfairly stereotypes Native Americans.
That the hill, if preserved and beautified, could be used as a cultural attraction for Oxford's many Interstate visitors is a possibility City Hall seems to think is worth far less than that dirt itself.
Oxford calls this progress — more retail development, another store to provide city coffers with more sales-tax and property-tax revenue.
Others, including this editorial board, call it a blatant unwillingness to preserve a historical site and recognize a people's ethnic value. It is a decision that should be reversed before such a valuable, historic site is dismantled for the sake of a membership card to Sam's Club.
Oxford's leadership decided long ago to use retail development as a prime way to move the city forward. In some ways, it's worked: Oxford is the unrivaled destination for Calhoun County shoppers who don't want to travel to Birmingham or Atlanta.
In turn, Oxford gets wads of cash, and local bargain hunters haven't far to go for their shopping sprees.
But this time, Oxford's build-it mentality is out of bounds. There has to be another way, a compromise way. If so, city leaders would be wise to take it.
But if we are going to apologize for what our ancestors did, don't we need to take credit for the good that they did? Of course not. That would be ridiculous.
But most all of us have historical sites that are important to us. One race should not be more important than another. The issue should be the choice between economic progress and preserving a piece of history. How important is the mound and how important is Sam's? And is there a viable alternative that would save both?
Doesn't it say something in the Bible about the sins of the fathers being visited upon the sons and grandsons? I'm not an Old Testament scholar but it seems to me that is mentioned....
As for me, I personally apoligize to the Native Americans for the atrocities that were committed upon them by our ancestors. I don't know if that will help, but I do think what happened those 170 years ago was not right and I will not attempt to deny my forefathers actions were justified. Manifest Destiny? I don't think that was justified in any way.
Having said that, isn't it time we moved on? Well I guess we could if we were sensitive to the feelings of others. In my opinion, and I guess all the above falls in that same category, we didn't do right by the Native Americans in this last episode.
I abhor politicians who try to sidestep their personal responsibility by making statements like, "it was just used for sending smoke signals." How insensitive and condescending can one get? I'm sure those who agree with the mayor and Mr. Denny feel that settled the issue. It doesn't for many though.
Regards,
(note to Star.... Can you give us a way to edit our posts for clarity after posting)?
this kind of disrespect for the burials of others is based in racism. pure and simple. you can't be who we are, you can't understand how we lived, so you destroy what our ancestors built.
the culture that built stone structures on the tops of hills and ridges and valleys is not well understood by scholars. many of these structures have been investigated, but very few archaeological objects have been found. they are very ancient.
there's something the people of this town need to know about mounds. things were hidden in them, and for a reason. sometimes they were good things, like things which ward off tornadoes or which bring rain during dry spells or which ward off diseases. and sometimes they were bad things, things put there to stay and to protect the community and the region nearby from their influence.
of course, if we had not been removed by force, in violation of our 1832 treaty, we could have lived as neighbors and friends and even as relatives, and you would know these things from our elders.
just be very careful what you do. you may think you are just hurting us, but you may be hurting yourselves.
remember, we know this land better than you. it's only 170 years since we were forced out, and our elders still speak of it. we lived here many thousands of years before your people arrived. we know you had commandments against coveting and stealing and killing, but you pushed us off our lands and thousands of our people died as the army marched us to Oklahoma, fed by the lowest bidder. this wasn't a trail of tears. read your history. "we were run out like dogs."
i hope the Star calls Oklahoma and finds some of our people who keep the traditional faith to talk about this.
he should be fired!