Logging on, at high speeds
by The Anniston Star Editorial Board
Oct 07, 2009 | 594 views | 5 5 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Describing dial-up Internet service as the dinosaur of the wired world is inaccurate. That archaic method of connecting to the Web isn't extinct.

Of course, other than Luddites or those too lazy to upgrade, who would want to use it? It's the 21st-century example of using hammer and chisel on a stone tablet to compose a letter.

There's a better, quicker, more efficient way.

Unfortunately, some Americans — especially those in rural areas — have no choice but to use dial-up to conduct everyday business on the Web. For those without access to faster broadband service, the Internet is no information superhighway.

It's a slow, frustrating lane that hinders activities, limits what workers can accomplish and reduces what online classes students can take.

Thus, it is no small matter that a coalition of prominent business leaders is urging President Obama to prioritize upgrading of the nation's broadband availability. Yes, the Obama White House has much on its plate: two wars, a recession, record joblessness, health-care reform and next year's mid-term elections — and more.

But this influential coalition, laboriously titled the Knight Commission on the Information Needs of Communities in a Democracy, should not be ignored. Its name is cumbersome, but its message of providing a fast flow of online information in America is spot-on accurate.

It's regrettable that Alabama is one of those states laden with rural areas devoid of broadband service, yet there's comfort in knowing that some in Montgomery long ago made the issue of improving access to high-speed Internet connections a top concern.

Gov. Bob Riley's broadband initiative, ConnectingALABAMA, is a two-year plan designed to improve accessibility and locate barriers to high-speed service in the state. Riley also frequently touts the state's ACCESS program, which has linked the state's public schools and eliminated many examples of smaller schools providing fewer academic choices than those in larger, more urban districts.

The governor's words from earlier this summer still ring true: "Broadband service for every community is essential to Alabama's success in the 21st century."

In this instance, Alabama provides an example of why the Obama administration should act on the Knight Commission's suggestions. It's attention this state should welcome.

As technology advances, the world will only become more wired, the activities of our lives intertwined with the Web: Doing our jobs, paying bills, going to school, communicating with friends. That's not going to change.

Nearly all of the Western world long ago wholeheartedly embraced high-speed service. America's rural areas need these same advantages.
comments (5)
« setsail98@hotmail.com wrote on Wednesday, Oct 07 at 03:37 PM »
I understand the poster. I do not understand the star's analogy.
« vonage@vonage.com wrote on Wednesday, Oct 07 at 03:18 PM »
Not sure what the original poster was getting at but I did find this about Luddites though:

1. Any of a group of British workers who between 1811 and 1816 rioted and destroyed laborsaving textile machinery in the belief that such machinery would diminish employment.

2. One who opposes technical or technological change.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[After Ned Ludd, an English laborer who was supposed to have destroyed weaving machinery around 1779.]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

« Jamie Watts wrote on Wednesday, Oct 07 at 03:16 PM »
Just tell P~BO that everybody has a right to high speed internet....He'll do it....and don't forget internet should be paid for by the filthy evil rich....I'm surprised OwlGore didn't make sure of this when he invented the internet....
« setsail98@hotmail.com wrote on Wednesday, Oct 07 at 02:56 PM »
Wow, I can see a lot of research and forethought went into this article. Thanks editorial bored.
« anonymous wrote on Wednesday, Oct 07 at 09:59 AM »
Do the *editors* themselves edit these articles? Could The Star please point to a Luddite who would use a computer, much less connect it by any means, dial-up or broadband, to a network?

I won't take this opportunity to point out that newspapers are dying, and at an exponential rate, because their editorial staffs, "left and right", never saw a welfare or warfare cause they wouldn't promote - and promote with terrible syntax.