H. Brandt Ayers: A hunger in the South
Nov 22, 2009 | 1312 views | 12 12 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
From the rising Appalachians near Charlotte to the Low Country of Charleston, and surely in that great crescent of states all the way to Texas, I believe there is a great hunger in the South.

I was struck by this craving as never before in 50 years as a journalist in the South because of the reaction of audiences at Davidson College and in Charleston to a speech I invented for President Obama to give.

It was as if the listeners were spiritually famished and the president's words held out the promise that their longing would be satisfied. This feeling of validation has happened for black Southerners with the election of Obama.

The white majority still yearns for simple respect, for the nation to affirm that it is all right to be Southern and for the people of the South to enjoy symbols of their heritage without embarrassment or apology.

You see, for 144 years since the end of the Civil War, the Southern majority has been repeatedly told that it is not good to be who we are. We should be ashamed of who we are.

Southern whites have been regarded as lepers by the national Democratic Party, taken for granted by right-wing Republicans and sneered at by leading GOP moderates.

All signs, seals, symbols and songs native to our culture, according to the national consensus, must be deeply suppressed, and in their place we are told to accept … shame.

This is an unhealthy state of affairs. No people anywhere on Earth should be asked to live on a diet of shame. I remember the cold, unnatural feeling I had in the 1970s on my first visit to Germany because of the absence of any national flags or anthems. It seemed a nation trying to live on the thin gruel of shame.

Natural feelings bred into people as instincts cannot be suborned for long without feeding a caged monster. We have seen that monster loosed, waving an honorable flag with hatred that could and did kill.

Obama's invented words in my two speeches mesmerized the two audiences because they promised a relief from shame, the right to enjoy natural feelings and symbols without embarrassment.

Here is the scene I set for the president (a reminder to regular visitors to this space):

Obama is speaking to a vast audience in the Georgia Dome. A civil rights icon has just introduced him; U.S. Rep. John Lewis said his philosophical "Beloved Community" embraces white soul as well as black soul.

Majority white Southerners in the crowd made nervous by national scorn for their cultural totems wondered how the first black president would treat such explosive symbols as the Confederate flag.

He wrapped symbols in the one-nation theme of his speech: "I am reminded again that we are one undivided America, that the honored dead at Gettysburg wore blue AND gray; they fought under different flags that deserve honor and respect but are equal inheritors of one America, indivisible, because in their fighting and in their dying they made a nation out of a scattering of states.

"It is good that people set aside quiet, peaceful places to remind us that even in defeat, there was nobility of character and the men who fought under such leaders represent universal values of courage, honor and loyalty. Cultural symbols speak to people of important events that happened to them along the way." They deserve respect — and must never be dishonored by being used as symbols of hate.

Cultural reconciliation is a difficult process that requires constant attention through many media and levels, but it begins with a personal visit and sincere invitation. Southerners have always answered the call.

There is no reason to believe they would not volunteer if their president personally invited them to join him in the great restorative enterprise that the nation needs and the world expects.

He will find no greater patriots, none more willing to sign up and sacrifice for their country — if they are recruited with care and respect. A steady presence during his presidency could turn wary strangers away from suspicion and resentment, toward mutual respect, and maybe even friendship.

Releasing the white South from shame, filling the emptiness with feelings of self-respect, would release a surge of powerful emotions that with care and time could be of great benefit to the region and the nation.

A national Democratic Party listened to for the first time in generations could mean the end of a solid no-party South based on race and a normal division of two parties on realistic issues of health, education, environment, etc.

Normalization of the political process for the first time in the South would allow the region to break out of its unnatural state of apartheid and elevate the national dialogue by discounting fringe issues.

We would then be one nation, truly indivisible, the vision Obama projected in his campaign — an historic union he could achieve, if he has the desire and the will to engage in a strategic effort to win over the Southern majority.

It is up to you, Mr. President. You went all the way to Egypt to seek reconciliation between America and the world of Islam. Will you make the short trip to Atlanta to seek reconciliation with the Southern majority?
comments (12)
« AHS1960@HOTMAIL.com wrote on Wednesday, Nov 25 at 10:42 PM »
drobertson wrote:

"...But I am convinced that populism, whether seized by the far right of the Republican Party or the moderate left of the Democratic Party, will determine the fate of our politics and our nation into our new century. The dated New South progressivism of the late nineteenth and the mid-twentieth-century not only does not have the answers; like Mr. Ayers, it simply doesn't ask the right questions....

Sir, a question from one of the unwashed....

How will we recognize this messiah?

(enjoyed reading your post)
« alvinhurst@bellsouth.net wrote on Wednesday, Nov 25 at 05:59 PM »
Barn fan huh John? I can understand why you don't want to talk about football.
« rterrell@centurytel.net wrote on Wednesday, Nov 25 at 04:56 PM »
Mr. Ayers reference to "Civil War" is wrong. Secession then was legal and the CSA was a legitimate separate nation. I have never been ashamed of being southern nor do I perceive my fellow southerners as being shameful.
« Jamie Watts wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 09:57 AM »
I see that Brandy wouldn't approve of my criticism....
« drobertson wrote on Tuesday, Nov 24 at 01:24 AM »
Mr. Ayers is right about the big picture, involving his sense of a yet-unapprehended change within the body politic. He usually is right on the big picture. However, he is flat wrong about the prosaic and particular details of that change, as he also frequently is. What is proposed by Mr. Ayers is a sort of up-dated, elitist-supported L. Q. C. Lamar Society, by which Southerners are assured by those in control that it is quite politic within reason to celebrate their Southerness. There's more afoot here than that. This is rather like observing before 1962, as the Star did, that George Wallace is an interesting but inconsequential young politician, and he rather reminds one amusingly of the diverting populist politicians such as "Cotton Tom" Heflin and "Sockless" Jerry Simpson, of our grandfathers' days.

What is now afoot, of course, is populism, but just as George Wallace was not a simple repeat of 19th and early 20th-century agrarian populism, so 21st-century populism is not recognizable to that last generation of elite, country-club progressives such as Mr. Ayers. Like the late Govenor Wallace himself, the new populism is sui generis. Unlike Wallace, this New Populism does not have a particularly African-American bias, (they sometimes reserve that animus for illegal Hispanic immigrants who claim social services) and it stretches far across our nation than merely the city limits of Charleston or to the Appalachians. It embraces, whatever the political party, a distrust of big banking and other elites, a championing of high local employment, a distaint for those who do not work and pay taxes, and an honoring of military service. It includes, for example, the right-of-center Sarah Palin from Alaska to the occasionally left-of-center Senator Jim Webb, a Vietnam combat veteran, from Virginia.

Whether this new national populism will take the form of the Know-Nothing ideology of ex-Governor Palin or the New Deal "We Do Our Part" NRA spirit of of Senator Webb, I do not presume to say. But I am convinced that populism, whether seized by the far right of the Republican Party or the moderate left of the Democratic Party, will determine the fate of our politics and our nation into our new century. The dated New South progressivism of the late nineteenth and the mid-twentieth-century not only does not have the answers; like Mr. Ayers, it simply doesn't ask the right questions.
« Jamie Watts wrote on Monday, Nov 23 at 01:39 PM »
Ayres is either too ignorant or too arrogant to realize that it's been people like himself(white southern liberals/progressives) that have caused the rest of the nation and world to look down on the south....Even while they practiced their own systems of apartheid....
« 04169@hotmail.com wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 09:37 PM »
Makes you mad don't it?

« anonymous wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 08:49 PM »
You guys proved Ayers point,talking about football and Wallace,get real unpc! you should care how you are perceived by the world,and not Gleb Beck,Rush,Palin,Bush,and Force News

edwardh
« alanchayes@hotmail.com wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 02:26 PM »
« alanchayes@hotmail.com wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 02:25 PM »
« alvinhurst@bellsouth.net wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 10:46 AM »
By thinking that we yearn for respect Mr. Ayers shows just what his mindset is. It is as with most liberals, one of elitism. By saying that we yearn for respect he is saying one of two things, that we do not have respect or that we do not think others respect us.

I say hogwash. We do respect ourselves. Yes in some cases we do think that others do not respect us. But guess what. We don't give a ----. Do we care if a bunch of weirdos in CA respect us? Do we care if a bunch of people in NY who are nearing bankruptcy respect us? Do we care if a bunch of Yankee pretenders can't stay on the football field with us? (Except Utah.) Do we care that these intelligent yankees, while looking down at us, elected these presidents from the south? What were they thinking? They must have had a mental lapse. Do we care that these intellects in northern states almost gave Wallace a majority vote? I could go on but you get the point.

Naw, I don't care.
« Rguy wrote on Sunday, Nov 22 at 06:43 AM »
The disconnect between the Deomcratic party and its leadership has little to do with their constant demeaning of our symbols and beliefs, of which they are most certainly guilty. It has more to do with their continued assault on our core beliefs: Christian morality, traditional marriage and family, right to bear arms for protection of our lives and property, smaller government vs. the government takeover of our constitutionally promised freedoms. This is not about a flag, it is about individual freedom vs. socialist style destruction of personal rights and the goverment take over of our individual lives. I don't care what liberal democrats think about southern symbols. I do care that they want to tred on my rights.