Bentley Says He Will Deny Illegal Immigrants Public Benefits - Truth Rating: 2 out of 5
by Daniel Gaddy
Star Staff Writer
Jul 29, 2010 | 6581 views | 19 19 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Fact Check

Republican gubernatorial candidate Robert Bentley says he will deny illegal immigrants state benefits. Truth rating: 2 out of 5

ROBERT BENTLEY'S CLAIM: He will "deny illegal immigrants public benefits such as Medicare, Medicaid, and unemployment insurance, public or assisted housing benefits, food assistance, and commercial licenses."

SUMMARY: Though states and local governments acquire costs because of illegal immigration, federal legislation bars unauthorized immigrants from the majority of federal and state benefits. The costs to states like Alabama come from services that are protected by national laws and court decisions, leaving states with few options for the restriction of benefits.

ANALYSIS: Many conservative pundits and organizations place the costs of welfare services to illegal immigrants in the billions. For more than 10 years, however, illegal immigrants have been ineligible for all but basic public benefits.

The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 prohibited illegal immigrants from any federal benefits. The benefits were defined as "any grant, contract, loan, professional license or commercial license provided by an agency of the United States or by appropriated funds of the United States." The law had only a few exceptions such as the use of emergency services, soup kitchens and disaster relief. The act, usually shortened to PRWORA, also made illegal immigrants ineligible for state benefits with the same exceptions as the federal regulations.

According to the Department of Health and Human Services, even legal immigrants are not eligible for food stamps or Medicaid until five years after they arrive in the country. They are also not eligible for SSI until they become U.S. citizens. However, exceptions are made for groups such as children or people with disabilities.

How do agencies verify someone's immigration status? According to the Congressional Research Center, many agencies offering public benefits use the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements database. This software allows agency administrators to check an applicant's immigration documents with the records of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

A 2007 Congressional Budget Office report said local and state governments did suffer small losses providing services for illegal immigrants, but had few options to limit or minimize the losses. According to the report, the losses were concentrated in education, health care and law enforcement.

"Rules governing many federal programs, as well as decisions handed down by various courts, limit the authority of state and local governments to avoid or constrain the costs of providing services to unauthorized citizens," the report stated.

The CBO reported that states' expenses for covering unauthorized immigrants were a small percentage of the overall costs of the programs. The average was less than 5 percent. In California, the state with the highest level of illegal immigrants, it was less than 10 percent.

The Star's efforts to reach representatives with the Bentley campaign have been unsuccessful.
comments (19)
« birdbrain2@mail.com wrote on Thursday, Aug 05 at 11:51 AM »
"The GOP knows if 10-50 million, or how ever many there are here now, liberal minded latinos suddenly get the vote this would mean no more party of the rich."

The Democrats know that many potential Democrat votes would keep them in power for years to come. That's all they're after - power. They don't care about anything else.



« BILLDJENNINGS@EXCITE.COM wrote on Thursday, Aug 05 at 11:50 AM »
Thank you Von: When I was in Mexico working, when Reagan'a NAFTA was signed, the estimatation of contribution to the Rio Grande Valley economy by Mexicans was two billion annually. Or about 4 times what the impact was of "Winter Texans". I spent 33 months working in Mexico for a small US owned business and living in south Texas. So I have first hand experience. signed TDS 1972
« BILLDJENNINGS@EXCITE.COM wrote on Thursday, Aug 05 at 11:32 AM »
Hick:

Your FOXX news is showing. I said the GOP and tea bags were the ones who "pretend to be on the side of America by God". No where in my comment did I say the Democrats were not involved with the border crossing that was just part of your FOXX fed knee jerk reaction to the truth. The GOP and tea teaers teaest are the only ones crying about stopping the flow by closing the border and sending everyone home. The Democrats and others are calling for immigration reform to make them all legal after they have lived here for so long as hard working, tax paying and law abiding Americans. Giving them the vote as US citizens. The GOP knows if 10-50 million, or how ever many there are here now, liberal minded latinos suddenly get the vote this would mean no more party of the rich. Then the GOP would have to reform itself to what it used to be, a party of the conservative working class and small business owning American.
« vonage@vonage.com wrote on Wednesday, Aug 04 at 09:51 PM »
BillDJennings,

Think I know you, or my wife does. AHS 1964?

I like what you say and agree with you.
« hickoryshade@gmail.com wrote on Wednesday, Aug 04 at 09:39 PM »
Legal immigration. I guess if a conservative supports the law that immigrants are supposed to go by are only in it for the money but if a dim is for it, they are being a wise savior of a whole people! LMAO! I guess there are no rich dims that own big corporations that make money from illegal labor? What about the block vote the dims are trying to secure by favoring illegal aliens to nest here? Why doesn't your president of choice want to enforce the fair and lenient immigration laws already on the books? Securing future dims is the reason.

No, The Tea Party and some reasonable conservative GOP members are for controlling our borders and going by the laws already on the books. Dims just don't get it!
« BILLDJENNINGS@EXCITE.COM wrote on Wednesday, Aug 04 at 05:48 PM »
The illegal immigration issue is a little more complicated than most people know or even care about. More illegal immigrants enter the US legally than illegally. In Texas, Arizona, New Mexico and California millions of Mexicans, Central and South Americans cross the Rio Grand everyday. They have permission to cross from the states to spend money and work in domestic and other jobs. Every night they return to Mexico with groceries in hand(there is a federal sales tax in Mexico that was 10% in 1994 possibly higher now)to there homes where it is cheaper to live and they have family and friends. This has been going on for decades. Legal and illegal migrant workers cross the same border, with the aid of small and large businesses, to work in the US and are protected by their employers. So even with all the anti-illegal immigrant hype this is "never going to change"!!! The corporations who make it here use illegal workers because they will work harder and without benefits and never complain. So Arizona and all the hype is just another way the GOP and tea bag crowd pretend to be own the side of America by God! Well they are in it to win it just like everybody else. What's in it for them? Big profits what else?
« SCARLLETT5@AOL.COM wrote on Wednesday, Aug 04 at 10:43 AM »
Has anyone ever wondered why the federal government refuses to enforce the immigration laws already in place?

Arizona has the guts to enforce these laws and the feds are upset and want to sue them for enforcing the laws they refuse to enforce.

This is simply a case of the coorporate elite controlling the federal government and that is called facism.

Taxpayers are paying for the New World Order to have slave labor and drive wages down. The taxpayers are being robbed again not by the illegals but the facist state called The United States of America.
« bob3620300@yahoo.com wrote on Sunday, Aug 01 at 04:36 PM »
You failed to "Recommend" the Sparks story along with Bentley, what is that all about? Now that's a freak show if I ever read one. In the interest of "fair and balanced" reporting,will you be recommending that story soon?
« johnson20062@yahoo.com wrote on Saturday, Jul 31 at 08:30 AM »
the star is a "democrat" paper.
« psnider672001@yahoo.com wrote on Saturday, Jul 31 at 07:41 AM »
I wonder how much money the star is either giving or receiving Sparks?
« honestgovernment76@yahoo.com wrote on Friday, Jul 30 at 07:28 AM »
Jim Johnson your right that I won't try to take unlimited authority and wouldnt try as it violates everything I stand for as a citizen and veteran.

The one important point to note is that in three months WE ALL have the opportunity to take authority and make changes that can really help our Country. It won't be absloute authority and that would be dangerous as we have seen that either Democrat or Republican with too much power is dangerous.

The problems discussed are trivial but the solution is complicated given the time it takes to make political changes and the tendency of politicians to fund their own agendas instead of fixing the issues affecting the people.

Please encourage everyone to vote in November and above all encourage a vote for conservative minded candidates.
« jimjohnson@mail.com wrote on Friday, Jul 30 at 07:17 AM »
".....Give me 3 months and unlimited authority...."

Sir, that sure sounds like the same exact words a certain german man spoke years ago. Nobody gives unlimited authority. The only way to get unlimited authority is to take it, and I'm thinking you wont.
« bob3620300@yahoo.com wrote on Friday, Jul 30 at 01:33 AM »
Bentley is a loser, selected largely by the AEA/Democrats to run against their man Sparks. Republicans were once again hoodwinked by the other party into voting for a loser to represent them in the governors' Office. Yes, I mean the majority of voting republicans selected the least qualified republican candidate to run against the democrats, mind boggling isn't it?
« Hootchapappy@cableone.net wrote on Thursday, Jul 29 at 10:53 PM »
You can pick just about any county in Alabama, simply drive past ANY construction site whether it be new homes being built or even larger commercial construction, and you will find quite a few illegals working that have provided fake social security cards. What's so bad is the fact that the employers don't care and they don't even try to verify whether those SS#'s are legitimate. What kind of punishment do you think we need to start giving these employers? If we make the punishment strict enough, like freezing their bank accounts and assett's and also giving each offense a MINIMUM MANDATORY PRISON SENTENCE of 5 years, I think that would work pretty well. However, we would have to do the same thing towards any Judges that turn a blind eye to this activity, because most Judges are receiving campaign funds from most bigger builders and General Contractors.
« birdbrain2@mail.com wrote on Thursday, Jul 29 at 08:16 PM »
Yo, parker, you seem to going off on some wild tangent there.

Do you suggest we let the illegals continue to break the law and stay and keep using fake ids and social security cards and such and keep receiving federal benefits illegally? Just because they had it rough in Mexico? Why don't you invite a few to live with you, since you're so keen on letting law breakers continue their ways.

If the feds would do their job, the states wouldn't have to try and do it for them.

Oh, and nice try on the personal attack...I kinda expected it,,,you libs are so predictable.
« Hootchapappy@cableone.net wrote on Thursday, Jul 29 at 07:43 PM »
Sorry to spoil someone's day, but the truth is... Bentley can't do anything by himself except for making false promises. He himself cannot do anything without the vote of other people first. Just like Obama, he too can't do anything unless congress approves it first. Get a grip on reality. He would be better off asking for the people's help rather than making false promise's that he and everyone else knows he can't keep.
« honestgovernment76@yahoo.com wrote on Thursday, Jul 29 at 07:14 PM »
We don't have to deport anyone. If we enforce our laws they will leave on their own. It's the baited field we have created called the United States of everything is free that keeps the illegals here. Enforce the laws and they will leave.

It's kind of like the horse sqeeze we keep calling the war on drugs. The druggies are the only ones fighting to win and killing. Give me 3 months and unlimited authority and I can eliminate 95% of the drugs in any state. Enforce the laws and tell the lawyers to kiss off and the druggies will self deport to another state.
« parkerhody@gmail.com wrote on Thursday, Jul 29 at 06:03 PM »
Raj, You are just full of them. What do you suggest we do? "Round'em up and send'em back"? Do you realize Mexico is being crippled by violence and poverty? Do these people not deserve to escape this hell? Perhaps if they were not so afraid of the "Round'em up and Ship'em back" attitudes that so many display, We would have more Illegals coming forward for citizenship, Guess what? When they become legal they WILL be able to receive benefits. So what do you suggest?

By the way, RAJ, That doesn't sound like a name given to an American born citizen.... Are you LEGAL? Can we see some paperwork? Oh wait, this isn't Arizona.

« birdbrain2@mail.com wrote on Thursday, Jul 29 at 05:37 PM »
"The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 prohibited illegal immigrants from any federal benefits."

Just because it's against the law doesn't mean they don't do it. After all, it's against the law to sneak into this country, and they didn't care about that, did they?

From fake ids to fake social security cards to fake drivers licenses, these illegals are getting the federal benefits that they don't deserve. And Bentley is as tired of it as the rest of us are.

This article is the first in what I'm sure will be a long series of anti-Bentley reports, thinly disguised as "fact checks".

The Star is firmly behind their man Sparks, and they know that Bentley has a good chance of beating him - a better chance than Byrne did.

Keep it up, Star.