A law-enforcement travesty
by our readers
Nov 24, 2012 | 2354 views |  0 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Re “Police charge second suspect in April homicide” (News article, Nov. 8):

I was very disappointed and upset to learn that a person indicted for the April murder in Anniston of Dequirea Royal was free on probation at the time of the killing and had a suspended sentence for a recent (2011) first-degree robbery conviction, for which he had been given 15 years. How can this be?

I did social work in the Jefferson County jail in the 1970s and recall that sentencing for felons convicted of first-degree robbery required at least a few years of penitentiary time. Surely, sentencing has not gotten softer since then — but apparently it has.

This was a horrendous act of violence that might have been avoided had the indicted party, Kenmonte Jacob Winsley, been in the penitentiary as he should have been. And the victim turns out to be a patriotic soldier of the National Guard who was preparing to deploy to Afghanistan.

And this, in Alabama, where we’re supposed to be so conservative? Has the judge explained why Winsley was free at the time of the murder? I find the whole business an unnecessary tragedy and maddeningly outrageous. Regardless of how the case turns out, I am extremely disappointed that a convicted first-degree robber with a 15-year sentence would be free on probation and on a suspended sentence in the first place. Would someone in the legal or law-enforcement profession please explain?

Rufus Kinney
Comments must be made through Facebook
No personal attacks
No name-calling
No offensive language
Comments must stay on topic
No infringement of copyrighted material

Friends to Follow

Most Recommended

A law-enforcement travesty by our readers

Today's Events

event calendar

post a new event

Friday, April 18, 2014