Group petitions Oxford over American Indian site
by Dan Whisenhunt
Staff Writer
Jul 07, 2009 | 3642 views | 29 29 comments | 61 61 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A group protests the destruction of a stone mound that is believed to be an American Indian burial ground behind the Oxford Exchange at Oxford City Hall Monday night. Photo: Bill Wilson/The Anniston Star
A group protests the destruction of a stone mound that is believed to be an American Indian burial ground behind the Oxford Exchange at Oxford City Hall Monday night. Photo: Bill Wilson/The Anniston Star
slideshow
At the Oxford City Hall on Monday Tony Castaneda holds a sign that reads  Leon What cha Smoking?  during a protest of the destruction of a stone mound that is believed to be an American Indian burial ground. Photo: Bill Wilson/The Anniston Star
At the Oxford City Hall on Monday Tony Castaneda holds a sign that reads 'Leon What'cha Smoking?' during a protest of the destruction of a stone mound that is believed to be an American Indian burial ground. Photo: Bill Wilson/The Anniston Star
slideshow
OXFORD — The city is still hearing from American Indians and others who oppose the city's destruction of a native stone mound.

But city officials ignored another protest Monday over the city's decision to destroy the mound atop a hill behind the Oxford Exchange shopping center.

Two American Indians on Monday presented Mayor Leon Smith with a petition containing more than 600 signatures of people opposed to the destruction of the site.

Tony Castaneda, of Anniston, and Sharon Jackson, of Fruithurst, who both claim to be American Indian elders, gave Smith the petition.

They followed up with a protest at City Hall at 7 p.m. where they collected more signatures.

Smith became agitated when the two arrived at City Hall with the petition Monday afternoon. They were observed by a reporter and a camerawoman from The Star. Smith demanded the journalists take their camera and leave. The journalists refused and Smith turned away. He took the petition and went back inside City Hall.

According to the Alabama Historical Commission's deputy state historic preservation officer, the mound at the center of the dispute is the largest of its kind in the state. The site is at least 1,500 years old and was constructed during what was known as the Woodland era. The city, through its Commercial Development Authority (CDA), has paid to have part of the hill taken down and used as fill for a Sam's Club under construction near the shopping center. The remainder of the hill is planned for more commercial businesses.

There is some dispute about the importance of the site. Harry Holstein, a professor of archeology and anthropology at Jacksonville State University has said it could contain human remains. Smith and city project manager Fred Denney say it was used to send smoke signals.

Preservation officials and the protesters have said that's unlikely.

Denney and the city would not give a reporter and photographer from The Star permission to climb to the top of the hill to take pictures, though the hill is owned by the CDA which is an arm of the city. A woman who answered the phone in Smith's office said no one could go on the hill for "safety and security reasons," but declined to specify what safety and security issues were present. She declined further comment.

Denney also said Monday he will stop talking about the hill, though he's spoken about it to a reporter before.

"I got no comment on that mountain," Denney said.

Glen Wilkins, a spokesman for Wal-Mart which owns the Sam's Club, said no one has contacted the company regarding the destruction of the mound for the Sam's Club. That conflicts with the accounts of protesters who said they have contacted the company.

A protester forwarded an e-mailed response he received from Wal-Mart about the mound to The Star Monday.

"It's because of people like you that Wal-Mart works hard to save people money so they can live better," the e-mail reads in part. "Because of your initiative, a copy of your message will be forwarded to our Real Estate Division for consideration."

Wilkins referred all questions about the mound to the city.

The protest Monday afternoon drew less of a crowd than a protest at the Oxford Exchange on June 26. More than 50 people showed up then, while more than a dozen were present Monday. Several people driving on U.S. 78 honked and waved in support, while a few stopped to sign the petition. Protesters say they got the bulk of their names at Oxford's Freedom Festival on Saturday.

The protesters dressed in colorful native garb and had signs that were equally as colorful, playing off Smith and Denney's claims that the mound was used for smoke signals.

One depicted a drawing of Smith smoking a cone-shaped "cigarette" under the caption: "Leon: What'cha Smoking?"

Another sign held by Teresa Reece of Anniston said, "Send Mayor Smith and Fred Denney a Smoke Signal: We Were Here First."

Castaneda said the lower turnout didn't disappoint him.

"I consider this a success, a test to see if we were stopped by the police," he said. "We had no problems. An unmarked police car honked his horn."

Castaneda said protesters would continue bringing attention to the site.

"Right now we're trying to settle this peacefully," he said.
comments (29)
« tuchesuavae wrote on Thursday, Jan 07 at 08:20 PM »
What happened to preserving America? Native land IS American! Has anyone contacted the historic preservation society?
« mdogg wrote on Tuesday, Aug 25 at 07:42 PM »
what a bunch of yokels!may the oxford exchange become a bankrupt,abandoned shell.save signal mountain!
« TsoiDigatlida wrote on Thursday, Aug 06 at 12:45 PM »
The Mound is an important in preserving not only Oxford's past but the history of Man Kind.

I, Tsoi Digatlid (aka David EbonyAllen Barkley) of the Green Mt. Band of Anniyunwiwa Vermont stand in solidarity with protester.

« ToTsuWa wrote on Wednesday, Jul 08 at 08:21 AM »
This mound was and is an important part of life for us whose ancestors came from there and families who are still there. I live Cherokee country in Oklahoma and my Cherokee family originally came from exact area of Alabama. These sites are not just pieces of dirt, but connections to our ancestors and our earth. If this was a church cemetary or historic Confederate site, you know they wouldn't be doing this. This site is sacred. You who are protesting are in our prayers here in Oklahoma. Keep up the fight. It is well worth every minute!
« anonymous wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 09:49 PM »
why doesnt the city of oxford hold up construction on this site long enough for the archologists to do a dig and try to recover as many artifacts as possible. this same procedure has been used at other sites that are of historical value and are in the way of progress.

« BullnMiss wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 09:46 PM »
Leon doesn't want anyone up there because he is Afraid someone will Dig around and Find something to Proove the Historical Value of the Mound. It is the Largest of it's Kind in the State of Alabama and at Least 1,500 years old and it is from the Woodland Era.

I think that is Historical Enough!!

I have seen the Mounds in Moundville and they didn't know what they were used for at first.. but did the Research to find out and have Preserved every one of them. This one should be too!

Why do we have to Keep Loosing our History? A Sam's Club or Another Damn Strip Mall? Are we so Shallow that we would Rather Bury and Destroy our History instead of Preserve it for our Future Generation's?

Does anyone Realize that if it is Preserved that it could bring More People to the Oxford Exchange? I live here and I want to Walk to the Top of that Mound...and Ironicly... I would Pay to do it!! I am sure there are Many other People who would also whether it be Local's, Race Fan's, or Summer Vacationer's and Passing Tourist. I thought that is what the Exchange was Suppose to be... somewhere to Stop, Buy, Eat, and Maybe Relax if there was a Place... Oh wait there is one the Mound in Question and the area around it!! What would it take? Let the Grass Grow, Plant Tree's and Flower's known the the Region, a few Picnic Tables for People who would Rather Eat away from the Crowd's at the Exchange. Just think about it. If it were to Remain Intact how many People would come to see it. I would take my Family to see it.

To all the People that Keep saying:

"You didn't Care before why Start now?"

Because:

It was Hidden and Protected by Nature and untill NOW it wasn't in Threat of being Destroyed!

At any Point in Time this would be Protested by this Generation or the Next because the Generation's before us would have Protested it too!!
« Ronald Terrell wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 09:28 PM »
The facts are that Oxford sits along the I-20 corridor and is nestled south of Anniston. It's location not, Leon Smith that is responsible for it's rapid growth and development. It's similar to the place where I grew up which was a quiet country agricultural based rural county in Georgia. I saw cotton fields , peach orchards and cattle farms transformed into subdivisions ,golf courses and shopping areas. There were only a select few who realized profitability and the remaining citizens were faced with higher property taxes and rewarded with temp service jobs and low paying retail jobs. The merchants who located in Oxford were not banking on Oxford business alone. They were hoping to draw customers from the surrounding counties. And they chose to locate here because it looked lucrative . Leon is just sitting back basking in self glory because so many people think he did it. And he's become arrogant and belligerent.
« jnardo wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 08:12 PM »
America has so little of historical value, particularly in the South. Besides the obvious desecration of a Native American site, this is a sensless disregard for our history. And our history is more important that Sam's Club. There's plenty of dirt available that could be substituted. What's wrong with the public officials who are party to this?
« tugboatcharlie wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 08:01 PM »
UNPC, you may call me tug.
« DanWhisenhunt wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 07:31 PM »
For the record, JerDCamp, I am the one who wrote the story.
« DanWhisenhunt wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 07:31 PM »
JerDCamp- the ABC report you are referring to is incorrect. The manager of the water department has said the dirt will not be going for his water treatment plant; city project manager has said numerous times it will be used as fill for Sam's.

I have also reported in other stories that only part of the hill will be taken down; I repeated that here as well. City Project Manager Fred Denney said in a previous story the site will become a commercial project.

You should note ABC corrected its story online; it now says, "As the city scrapes away fill dirt for a new store, a protest is brewing."

Hope this clears up any confusion. Thanks for reading.
« commonman wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 04:18 PM »
This fight here is funny. Mayor Smith is nothing more than a redneck hot head. This is the best thing I have ever seen. How dare anyone question what the redneck mayor is doing. This guy going to haul off and hit a reporter one day. That will be classic.
« anonymous wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 04:03 PM »
I may regret commenting on this. No one really cares about what Smith does anyway. Someone asked how Smith has remained in office for so long. The answer is simple: Complacency. Some of you either blindly walk in and vote for him, but most of you stay at home on election day. Most of you picked a hell of a time to be concerned about what Smith and his cronies are doing now. This is what you voted for whether or not you showed up at the polls.

This isn't the first time Smith has bulldozed Oxford's history. And it won't be the last. All of you can either grin and bear it or complain for all the damn good it will ever do you.
« JerDCamp wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 03:54 PM »
ABC 33/40 covered this a few weeks ago. The mayor actually sat down with their reporter. He says it's not a Sam's Club, it's dirt for a water treatment plant. That might make a difference in knowing who to fight on this?

Also, the mayor is saying he's going to scrape off the top third of the mound and cover it with kudzu. Thought it was interesting that's his plan. Here's the article:

http://www.abc3340.com/news/stories/0609/635589.html
« Ronald Terrell wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 03:34 PM »
I am not one to just give up. Complaisancy never achieves anything. I will not patronize any business in Oxford at all. I will coordinate my shopping to exclude Oxford merchants and I will do so in a manner that will be cost effective to me. I will be not be biting off my nose to spite my face, either. It's very easy for some say , "the deed is done forget about it" but if your ancestors had been subjected to physical and cultural genocide as ours have you may look at things from another perspective.
« unpc wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 03:05 PM »
tugboat, May I call you tugboat or is it Mr. Charlie?

Anyhow, I agree that if the deed is done it is time to move on. And I agree with the question where were these protesters ten years ago? They at least should have tried to buy the mound or buy an agreement not to destroy it. Besides instead of protesting after the fact they should be home watching the news about Michael Jackson.
« slal wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 12:58 PM »
Finally people are seeing that SMITH think's he's above the law... How he has stayed in office this long amazes me.
« AlabamaPines wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 12:10 PM »
It's not surprising that some of the local leaders are behaving the way they are. One of the features of ignorance is that you don't generally know you have it.

What is surprising is that the normally shrewd businesspeople at Wal-Mart and Sam's Club haven't figured out what a public relations nightmare this could be. For now this is a local issue, but it has all the ingredients for a juicy national scandal.

It really is as appalling as it seems! Sacred ground becomes fill dirt. How sad for us to let our treasures be spoiled like this.
« LBG wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 11:38 AM »
I am appalled and disgusted by the apathetic reaction of so many people in our community. I am usually proud to say I'm a citizen of Alabama, but in situations like this shame hangs over my head because of all the ignorance and stupidity that rears it's head. It shows how lazy our culture has become, we'd rather have a Sam's Club than a benefit to our natural landscape. We'd rather give up than protest injustice.... people complain about politics, about politicians, about crime, yet Leon Smith is crooked as many mayors we see arrested on television and the people of Oxford ignore it... Why? Because he gave you a Target? What's the price? To your legacy? To your children? Or you give up after one protest? People wake up! Stop being fat complacent sheep! There is nothing wrong with protesting, with "making trouble" our forefathers did it! Civil rights leaders did it! The foundation of our society is that we are supposed to follow the "will of the people" and when that will isn't recognized we have the right to protest! How dare any one of you tell anyone to "go home"! You should be glad that not everyone shares your apathy and some people are willing to give up time and effort to causes such as this!
« tugboatcharlie wrote on Tuesday, Jul 07 at 11:17 AM »
Ronald Terrell, as i said enough is enough. The mound is destroyed, nothing can be done. If you read one of my earlier post, i was at the protest behind Kohl's to support this cause. I have enough sense to know when something has run its course. I am very happy with most things in Oxford. I may not always agree with everything, but who does? To protest is a waste of time. It's over, time to move on. As for crime in Oxford, it's lower than most cities. Why? We have a good justice system.