JSU professor: American Indian site is gone
by Patrick McCreless
Staff Writer
Jan 21, 2010 | 8558 views | 19 19 comments | 167 167 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Harry Holstein, Jacksonville State University professor of archaeology and anthropology, holds a topographic map of the new Oxford Recreation Complex while standing where the indian mounds were. Photo: Stephen Gross/The Anniston Star
Harry Holstein, Jacksonville State University professor of archaeology and anthropology, holds a topographic map of the new Oxford Recreation Complex while standing where the indian mounds were. Photo: Stephen Gross/The Anniston Star
slideshow
This photo from 1998 shows a team of archaeologists from Jacksonville State University standing in front of an American Indian mound with trucks parked on top of it. JSU professor of archaeology and anthropology Harry Holstein said the trucks held the tools the team used to excavate the side of the mound. The excavation uncovered American Indian artifacts and evidence it was an artificially constructed mound that had been originally documented in 1890.
This photo from 1998 shows a team of archaeologists from Jacksonville State University standing in front of an American Indian mound with trucks parked on top of it. JSU professor of archaeology and anthropology Harry Holstein said the trucks held the tools the team used to excavate the side of the mound. The excavation uncovered American Indian artifacts and evidence it was an artificially constructed mound that had been originally documented in 1890.
slideshow
OXFORD — A Jacksonville State University professor says an ancient American Indian site Oxford city officials agreed not to disturb has been destroyed, but he does not know by whom.

City officials claim the site is still intact.

JSU professor of archaeology and anthropology Harry Holstein said the site at the historic Davis Farm property in Oxford contained remnants of an American Indian village and the 3-foot-high base of a once 30-foot-high temple mound, which he says may have contained human remains.

When Holstein visited the site last summer, it was still intact.

But when he returned to the area Monday, he could find no sign of the mound or the village remnants.

The land is now flat, with tire tread marks clearly visible in the dirt.

"It's been flattened like a pancake," Holstein said. "There is just grass over it now."

Holstein believes the temple mound and village are related to a stone mound on a hill behind the Oxford Exchange. Last year workers hired by the city of Oxford attempted to destroy that mound and use the dirt below it as fill for a Sam's Club. Following protests from local residents and activists, the contractor hired by the city's Commercial Development Authority apparently stopped work there, and a private landowner says he is now providing fill dirt from his property.

The city is constructing its new sports complex on land near the former Davis Farm property on the other side of Leon Smith Parkway. The area near the location of the temple mound on the Davis Farm site is slated to become ball parks.

Oxford's project manager Fred Denney said the city has not disturbed the site.

"We've never done anything to it," he said.

Before construction began, Holstein and other JSU researchers prepared a report for the city. The report said the Davis Farm property contained some of the most significant archaeological sites in northeast Alabama. It recommended the city leave the sites alone.

City officials agreed to the recommendation and told the Alabama Historical Commission the site would be left alone, Denney said.

Stacye Hathorn, Alabama Historical Commission state archaeologist, confirmed Tuesday the city agreed not to disturb the sites.

"No, we're not touching the mound out there," Denney said Monday. "We did have some ribbon and stakes of where to go … to show we're not going any further than this."

Denney said the same thing when interviewed about the site in August. No markers were visible when a reporter visited the site on Monday.

After Holstein surveyed the area, he said he could not find any stakes or markers or any signs of the American Indian site.

"There was a big noticeable hump … maybe somebody stole it at night," Holstein said, jokingly. "(It) has been here since the 12th century and now it's gone. It was there when the city bought the property."

Denney said University of Alabama archeologists were hired to observe the construction work.

"They have been out there," he said. "They are watching us, looking to see if there are any artifacts."

Denney said no artifacts have been found since construction began. He added the hiring of the archaeologists to oversee the recreation center construction had nothing to do with the earlier mound controversy.

Chris Bryant, assistant director of media relations at the University of Alabama, confirmed Monday that members of the UA Office of Archaeology were working at the Davis Farm site.

"The University of Alabama's Office of Archaeological Research is evaluating the archaeological significance of the site," Bryant said. "Our role is ongoing."

Bryant would not be more specific about what the archaeologists were doing or if they had found any artifacts, citing a confidentiality agreement. UA archeologists were also hired to examine the stone mound behind the Oxford Exchange, but university officials last year declined to discuss their work for the same reason.

Mayor Leon Smith said Tuesday there should be archaeologists at the site, but did not know if they found anything. Smith said he was not familiar with the city's agreement to avoid disturbing the Davis Farm site.

"Fred Denney knows more about that than I do," he said. "If there is anything wrong out there, I don't know anything about it."

Holstein said he never came into contact with any Alabama archaeologists during his examination of the area.

According to the JSU report, which noted 12 separate excavations conducted by researchers, all of the sites on the Davis Farm property yielded hundreds of artifacts, indicating the area was occupied for thousands of years by prehistoric American Indian populations. The artifacts included gaming stones, greenstone tool fragments, and large amounts of ceramics and house wall fragments.

Records indicate much of the temple mound was bulldozed by farmers in the 1950s, Holstein said. He said the apparent loss of the village and mound was significant.

"History is important," he said. "There was a high probability there were human remains under that mound. It would be like tearing down Abe Lincoln's cabin."

To Holstein, the sites could have been restored and turned into an attraction similar to Moundville, near Tuscaloosa.

"I'm not against development," Holstein said. "But you can work with the natural and cultural resources."

Contact Patrick McCreless at 256-235-3561.
comments (19)
« bobperry@topographix.com wrote on Wednesday, Mar 31 at 09:38 AM »
Has Ground Penetrating Radar been considered to locate any buried remains at the site? Since my company specializes in investigating historic burial sites using ground penetrating radar, I have contacted a number of Oxford City departments including City Hall but no response to my offer has been made. You would thing that paying this construction company $12,000 a day for down time would put all possible options on the table to resume construction on the site.

Bob Perry

TOPOGRAPHIX.com

« setsail98@hotmail.com wrote on Wednesday, Feb 24 at 06:26 PM »
As usual, the star is not doing to well at follow-up stories and investigation. It appears to be a goner Thunder.
« nomaticwolf2003@yahoo.ca wrote on Wednesday, Feb 24 at 06:18 PM »
What the hey??You best hope the mound still stands or i promise you powerful repercussions!! Alabama Oxford
« mgalloway7@bellsouth.net wrote on Wednesday, Feb 10 at 02:54 PM »
jimn0868, no disrespect to you, sir, but I really wouldn't care if someone dug up my bones, much less my parents or grandparents. I just don't see what good my bones are doing buried underneath the ground. What nobody has mentioned is that one of the things going on this site is a "Miracle Field," where disabled kids, for the first time in their lives, can compete with other kids in baseball, softball, etc. Some are blind, some are in wheelchairs, some have muscular dystrophy. I would much rather that happpen than for someone to preserve my bones for no obvious reason. I do understand we are from different cultures and you have your beliefs. I respect that.
« jimn0868@yahoo.com wrote on Wednesday, Feb 10 at 02:09 PM »
The only reason that our people would build a mound at this location is to bury our people. I remember when I was 6 years old, My father would take us children to the mound to pray for our people and to leave items to help them for the after life. For someone to dig in our peoples graves is wrong and the spirits will not rest until it is stopped! How would you like it if someone was digging in your Great,Great Grand parents gave? This must stop now !!!!
« susandibiase@yahoo.com wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 03:55 PM »
They could have preserved it, but Leon and his thugs removed that option. In the dark of night, like the thieves they are.
« alvinhurst@cableone.net wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 04:47 PM »
Here's the thing. I can see and maybe agree with the value of historical sites. But to get all uptight because your great great great grandfather may have been buried there is a little disingenuous. Remember the dams that Alabama Power built? Remember the graves that they dug up and bodies they moved? Well I am sure they were somebodies relatives and more closely related than any in the mounds.

If we are going to raise cane based on kinship, let's have them drain these lakes and put the bodies back where they belong.

The truth is that biological kinship is overrated. How many of you really know for sure who your real father is anyway? Go ask you mother and see what she says. But it doesn't matter that much. What we have is just a bunch of genes passed down for ages and you get pot luck. As many genes as there are you probably didnt' get any of your great great grandfather's genes anyhow.

So the real issue is whether a particular site is worthy of preservation, not based on genealogy but based on common historical interest.
« martintusk@gmail.com wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 04:15 PM »
It sounds like these historical preservationists and professors just don't know how to get their point across or play hardball. A small podunk, uneducated town like Oxford is of course going to prefer a big payout from some land developer to a quaint little story about weird folk who build mounds to honor their pagan religion.
« setsail98@hotmail.com wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 03:09 PM »
I agree unpc... and I wanna see that no trespass/I jack your land sign torn down
« alvinhurst@cableone.net wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 02:55 PM »
Well instead of sitting here talking about it let's go find it. It was pretty big. He couldn't have moved it very far.
« setsail98@hotmail.com wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 02:33 PM »
Leon, you just voted your self out.
« bird dog wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 01:33 PM »
Leon Smith is behind all of this mound removal. His comments "that he had know knowledge of the mound removal" is a ridiculous statement.
« SCARLLETT5@AOL.COM wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 09:05 AM »
The very least the voting public of Oxford, Al. should expect and demand is basic decency and honesty but unfortunately they don't.
« asap2gmail@att.net wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 09:02 AM »
someone NEEDS to look into this situation who is not afraid of Leon Smith. How can one man hold so much power in such a big city? Every one who is standing behind this mess,and not saying or doing anything about what is being done to these helpless people. How would you want the place where your love ones buried,(no matter how long it's been)to be distubed? Remember their blood is on all of your hands.
« SCARLLETT5@AOL.COM wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 08:42 AM »
I wonder what the late Buford Pusser (Walking Tall Fame) of Mcnairy Co., Tenn. would say about the shennanigans going on in Oxford, Al.? There is a cloud of greed and evil that covers this community starting in city hall.
« rabbimonty@bellsouth.net wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 07:15 AM »
In Chief Joseph's surrender speach he said, "I will fight again no more forever"

My friends who staged the first round of protest over the mound are tired. One lost her aged mother, one has had a toe amputated, one has had back surgery,one has recently been hospitalized. We do not have the strength to take on Mayor Smith or the city of oxford again. It is not that we are not concerned we have simply been beaten into submission (sound familiar) Please, people of Calhoun County come to the aid of preservation. Save Davis Farm and the surrounding historical sites
« ivorybill@cableone.net wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 06:28 AM »
The Universisty of Alabama didn't do anything the last time. Need to get someone that cares about the site to observe the constructon site.
« howlandk@cableone.net wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 06:27 AM »
nothing happens in Oxford without Leon Smith knowing about it
« asap2gmail@att.net wrote on Thursday, Jan 21 at 04:02 AM »
the city of Oxford was warn not to mess with those indian sites. There was a possibilty that human remains we buried there.Why take chances you people have no respect for the rights of people or for the dead. All this for the love of money. The bible says men will become lovers of themselves and mammon.We can't serve both we so called CHRISTIANS!Example; City Of Aniston Ezell Park was given to the city for youth complex they later sold it to build businesses for profit now just look how many business are still there. God is still in control. These kind of weapons will form BUT THEY NEVER PROSPER!!!