American Indian remains found at sports complex site
by Dan Whisenhunt and Patrick McCreless
Staff Writers
Jan 21, 2010 | 5364 views | 28 28 comments | 123 123 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Harry Holstein, Jacksonville State University professor of archaeology and anthropology, holds a topographic map of the new Oxford Recreation Complex while standing where the indian mounds were. Photo: Stephen Gross/The Anniston Star
Harry Holstein, Jacksonville State University professor of archaeology and anthropology, holds a topographic map of the new Oxford Recreation Complex while standing where the indian mounds were. Photo: Stephen Gross/The Anniston Star
slideshow
Alabama's state archaeologist said Thursday that crews building Oxford's multi-million-dollar sports complex uncovered American Indian remains at the site.

Stacye Hathorn, the state archaeologist who works for the Alabama Historical Commission, said University of Alabama archaeologists contacted her around Jan. 8 with their findings.

"UA called, said they found a body, said it was Native American, said it was reburied and the site is being avoided," Hathorn said.

She said the call was the only one she had received about remains at the site. UA officials have been monitoring construction of the sports complex since it began last year. Hathorn would not provide a detailed description of what the archaeologists found or the specific location of the site because she did not want anyone to go looking for it.

Earlier this week, Jacksonville State University professor of archaeology and anthropology Harry Holstein said the site at the historic Davis Farm adjacent to the sports complex site in Oxford contained remnants of an American Indian village and the 3-foot-high base of a once 30-foot-high temple mound. He says the mound may have contained human remains. The Davis Farm property and the sports complex site are both part of an area archaeologists believe was once a large American Indian village site.

Holstein said the 3-foot mound has vanished, but the city claims it is still intact and hasn't been disturbed. A reporter visited the site this week and found no evidence of the mound.

When told of the archaeologist's discovery at the sports complex site Thursday, Holstein felt vindicated.

"I knew it," he said.

Holstein believes the Davis Farm property and adjacent site is associated with a mysterious stone mound across Leon Smith Parkway behind the Oxford Exchange.

Last year, a contractor hired by the city's Commercial Development Authority attempted to demolish that mound to use dirt underneath as fill dirt for a Sam's Club under construction. After protests from local residents and activists, the destruction stopped and a private landowner said the city started purchasing fill dirt from his property.

City officials claimed that stone mound was the result of natural forces.

Holstein and others, including UA archaeologists who produced a city-financed report on the mound, concluded it was likely man-made. Holstein believes that mound also may contain human remains.

City project manager Fred Denney still maintains the site behind the Oxford Exchange is unimportant, and said Thursday he had no knowledge of the discovery at the sports complex site.

He said the UA archaeologists were supposed to prepare a full report on their activities, which they would submit to the city at a later date. He said he did not know when the report would be completed.

"(The archaeologists) told us they've got people looking," Denney said.

Denney said the archaeologists are supposed to inform the Alabama Historical Commission if they find anything.

Denney said he and the city did not want to disturb any kind of remains at Davis Farm or any other site.

"We are not going to be a party to destroying a body that's been buried," Denney said. "The mayor backs that 100 percent."

When a reporter called Mayor Leon Smith for his reaction, he said he did not know anything about the discovery and accused The Star of trying to chase business away from Oxford. Then he hung up.

Denney said if he receives confirmation that human remains were discovered at Davis Farm, the city would alter its construction plans so as not to disturb them.

"Yes, we'd absolutely alter them," Denney said. "I would not be a part of altering a burial site."

Councilwoman June Land Reaves said she had not heard about the discovery and said she was upset when she learned Thursday about the disappearance of the mound on the Davis Farm site. She said the construction contract for the sports complex dictates crews would avoid "culturally sensitive" areas. She said she wanted a barrier around these sites to let visitors to the complex know about the history of the area.

"If they've actually found something we definitely need to be more careful," she said.

The news of the discovery took Councilman Phil Gardner by surprise.

"This is the first I've heard of finding remains," Gardner said. "I knew they'd found some arrow heads and pottery. They were supposed to have staked it off or fenced it off."

Councilman Steven Waits said he wanted to know what part of the site contained the remains and read the UA report before he would comment.

Attempts to reach other City Council members Thursday were unsuccessful.
comments (28)
« mariajones1956@yahoo.com wrote on Monday, Feb 01 at 09:26 AM »
If reference to the burials being excavated on Hwy 202 by JSU. I don't know about this project specifically but just to clear the subject, Federal and State burial law allows for the removal of human remains, Anglo, Native, slave, etc., under the direction of a qualified archaeological professional (cemeteries get moved all the time) and only after a lengthy bureaucratic process has been followed that involves the State Historic Preservation Office, Tribal leadership, and any Federal agency involved with the project. Sometimes the Tribes will allow for the removal of human remains and there are Federal guide lines that govern the process. Sometimes, the Tribes say NO WAY and that particular project must be revised to avoid them. That has been the problem with this Oxford Mound and Davis Farm sites all along. Had this project involved any Federal funding or permits, Leon would not have been able to bulldoze away with an archaeologist monitoring. The project would have entailed a thorough excavation and coordination with the Tribes regarding the remains.
« PrissiePaws5@aim.com wrote on Friday, Jan 29 at 02:58 AM »
On a side note- there are indeed burial sites at the Davis farm property. Family members have been buried there for years. Slaves have been buried there. And yet I don't see people crying out over this. Humm......
« PrissiePaws5@aim.com wrote on Friday, Jan 29 at 02:48 AM »
The simple fact here folks is that not one single human bone has been found on that hill. None. Nada. Zip. So evidently it's not a burial mound as told in the beginning. Secondly- the Davis Farm site and surrounding area has been a sod farm for years, not to mention a flood plain, so that whole area has been being "desecrated" for years, but yet no one drags out the soap box until now? I seem to recall JSU digging up actual skeletal remains around a creek off of Hwy 202 years ago- where were you all then- when there was actually a reason to cry out about a sacred site being desecrated?!?! And as far as industry goes- I don't know how many of you are keeping up with the economy, but about the ONLY industry that hasn't failed IS retail. While we're on the subject of retail, how many of you shop at the exchange? Better yet- Wal-Mart? That's a branch off of the Sam's Club Company you know..... And just for the record, Leon doesn't even WANT that ball park there- because of the location being so flood prone. Why would ANYONE, let alone the mayor, WANT to waste money on something that is going to flood every time it rains? Simple fact is that if he'd wanted it, it would already be done. Please don't misunderstand me, I understand the need to preserve heritage- but there are more pertinent issues to focus on.

« thunderhawk2062@yahoo.com wrote on Thursday, Jan 28 at 11:00 PM »
To rnr09

The city does not need a new park. They have more than any other area around. The city, Mayor Smith and Fred Denny all stated that the Temple Mound would not be touched, but guess what, they lied. If you live in Oxford, you should be used to that by now. Here's a good sugestion for you, go to the next city council meeting anf ask why they are not bringing jobs into the city, like manufacturing, assembly work, areas of industry that will hire hire than 5 or 6 people. Dod you know that the majority of people who work in Ozford, don't live in Oxford? This is a local issue, as stated, if you want to help Haiti, go there, there are organizations that will gladly have you with them, and even transport you there with only a visa, no passport. But watch the news hero, more people are being killed right now for just the clothes their wearing.

Time to rally the troops again

Mark Davis

Director

Alabama American Indian Movement

« nbray04@bellsouth.net wrote on Thursday, Jan 28 at 07:25 AM »
Yes these are two separate issues. And I'm glad you have done something to help the people of Haiti. I am not for the mayor. In fact, most of the council I don't agree with. What I find so outrageous is that whole area around the creek was probably inhabited by Indians. The entire Sherwood Forest neighborhood was possibly a camp for Indians. Did everyone pitch this same fit when the houses were built? I don't think it is greed. Where would you propose that the city go and build the new park? There just isn't that kind of land in Oxford where they could do this. And to "SaveTheSacredSitesAlliance", there are not evil spirits flying around. Read a Bible.
« SCARLLETT5@AOL.COM wrote on Tuesday, Jan 26 at 10:12 AM »
To: rnr09: In case you are unaware Haiti and the descecration of this ancient burial ground and bodies are two separate issues. I have personally donated to Haiti and I wonder how many at city hall have? You are just blowing smoke trying to skirt around the local evil enveloping the mayor and city of Oxford. This greed and destruction is unaceptable with most of the civilized world. You are the one who sounds like the village idiot.

« davidckitchen@gmail.com wrote on Sunday, Jan 24 at 01:30 AM »
Actually, this is not just a local issue. Any federally recognized Native American or Native organization can say that their ancestors should not be touched. And by federal law these sites that have to get federal permits or have any grants or loans with federal money are libel for law suits to stop this. But even if they don't get stopped the complex will never be any good to anyone. it will fail and the disturbed spirits will make it uninhabitable. And we will let the world know about this on our Save The Sacred Sites Alliance website. So even if they win, they will lose because all involved will be marked as bad monetary investments because of their part in this. Have a good life. :-)
« nbray04@bellsouth.net wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 08:59 PM »
Basal...that's exactly the response I would expect from the village idiot. you are placing more value on what is happening to people who have been dead for hundreds of years versus what is happening to people today. I hate that this has happened on a burial ground but chances are this whole area is an ancient indian something. you are making a bigger deal out of this than is necessary.
« wooman11@aol.com wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 08:13 PM »
NASAL YOU MIGHT BE OVER THE LINE
« nbray04@bellsouth.net wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 07:01 PM »
This is the dumbest thing I have ever seen people rally around. We have people in Haiti having to go through a living hell and we are sitting up here worried that we "might" have found a burial ground. I grew up around that area and yes, I have found arrow heads all over that place. So should they have not developed the neighborhood that I grew up in. Get a life. The city only has so much land and those fields are needed very much so in our city. Some of you don't even live in Oxford. Why don't you participate in discussions that affect your city.
« setsail98@hotmail.com wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 06:39 PM »
Gawd, nobody can figure out if you peeps are even real!
« snow_cookies@Yahoo.com wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 04:45 PM »
Laurie is correct on the reburial. Native Elders or a Native Holy Person should have been called in to perform the proper rites.
« dwhisenhunt@gmail.com wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 04:37 PM »
lauriech- In answer to your question, as I understand it UA archaeologists WERE present when this happened as part of their monitoring process.

Hope that clears things up.

Dan Whisenhunt, Assistant Metro Editor
« tugboat2@inbox.com wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 04:30 PM »
scarllett5 , do you think these councilpersons sit around all day asking whats going on? They have jobs and i would hope their mind would be on their job during the day. Now how do they find out when it is being hid and someone doesn't notify them? Just like you and i the Star. Leon and his cronies keep these things hidden from these people. Why did they not ask Spurlin? he's the president and a yes man for Leon. I'm surprised Gardner didn't know or said he didn't.
« ivorybill@cableone.net wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 01:44 PM »
They will probably find several more bodies at the site. Need to bring in people from the outside to watch over the construction to be sure the bodies are taking care of in the correct way. ADEM should not have allowed wet areas to be developed like the new mall or this area. Someone needs to talk to every person from ADEM that has been on either site.
« susandibiase@yahoo.com wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 10:42 AM »
Oxford has sold its soul for retail development. It is an example to surrounding towns of a devil's bargain we don't want to make.

Leon Smith toys with a lot of people. It's humiliating for these councilmen to be made to sound so uninformed.
« SCARLLETT5@AOL.COM wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 10:31 AM »
Tugboat, It should be her job to know what it going on with the city. Here is her statement according to the Anniston Star: Councilwoman June Land Reaves said she had not heard about the discovery and said she was upset when she learned Thursday about the disappearance of the mound on the Davis Farm site.

Waits is not any better here is his statement: Councilman Steven Waits said he wanted to know what part of the site contained the remains and read the UA report before he would comment.

That's like trying to close the barn door after the cow has already gotten out. These people don't even have a fox watching the hen house or the right hand doesn't even know what the left hand is doing.
« tugboat2@inbox.com wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 10:17 AM »
Let me say Scarlett5, if you had attended many Oxford city council meetings you would know that Councilwoman June Reaves & Councilman Steven Waites have battled Leon for several years. They have fought for the good of the people. The reason they can't win as many battles is because Leon is a puppeteer pulling the strings of the other three councilmen. When the voters of Oxford replaced Henderson and Thrower they put Leon back on his throne. Don't be barking at June and Steven i know from experience they speak the truth.
« SCARLLETT5@AOL.COM wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 08:52 AM »
The above comments posted by the city council sounds like the three monkeys: hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. They all must be a bunch of dumb bunnies or they are not doing their jobs and need to be replaced. Too bad, they don't have a back bone to confront King Leon. Smith hung up on the reporter and clearly his only concern was "chasing off business." Civilized humans don't want their ancestors grave sites desecrated for "business" as Smith puts it.
« carzonepiedmont@bellsouth.net wrote on Friday, Jan 22 at 08:27 AM »
I think Smith is like a communist and he does what he wants, no matter what. Yes, he has been responsible for bringing a lot of businesses to Oxford but some of the ways he does it is disgraceful. Digging up places where graves were, and then saying they had not bothered them but they are gone. How stupid does he think people are? Something legally should be done about this.